<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Privatising Public Knowledge Draft Regulations: confusing the public domain and the commons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aliquidnovi.org/privatising-public-knowledge-draft-regulations-confusing-the-public-domain-and-the-commons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aliquidnovi.org/privatising-public-knowledge-draft-regulations-confusing-the-public-domain-and-the-commons/</link>
	<description>Africa creativity innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 17:01:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4808</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mario Hargianto</title>
		<link>http://aliquidnovi.org/privatising-public-knowledge-draft-regulations-confusing-the-public-domain-and-the-commons/comment-page-1/#comment-62997</link>
		<dc:creator>Mario Hargianto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 05:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aliquidnovi.org/?p=293#comment-62997</guid>
		<description>Such proposed regulations for the Intellectual Property Rights from Publicly Financed Research, which distorts the concept &quot;the public domain&quot; and &quot;open source&quot; (&quot;the commons&quot;) are very dangerous for the whole society. This proposal indicates the gap and mismatch between proposer&#039;s concept with the reality.
What Andrew Rens wrote is exactly clear and true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Such proposed regulations for the Intellectual Property Rights from Publicly Financed Research, which distorts the concept &#8220;the public domain&#8221; and &#8220;open source&#8221; (&#8220;the commons&#8221;) are very dangerous for the whole society. This proposal indicates the gap and mismatch between proposer&#8217;s concept with the reality.<br />
What Andrew Rens wrote is exactly clear and true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IPR Act Regulations promulgated &#8211; the death knell for open science in South Africa? &#187;</title>
		<link>http://aliquidnovi.org/privatising-public-knowledge-draft-regulations-confusing-the-public-domain-and-the-commons/comment-page-1/#comment-62713</link>
		<dc:creator>IPR Act Regulations promulgated &#8211; the death knell for open science in South Africa? &#187;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 21:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aliquidnovi.org/?p=293#comment-62713</guid>
		<description>[...] is confusion in the Regulations between public domain, open source and open access (see Andrew Rens&#8217;s blog on this question), but Section 2 (12) appears to be trying to say that where a the university wants [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is confusion in the Regulations between public domain, open source and open access (see Andrew Rens&#8217;s blog on this question), but Section 2 (12) appears to be trying to say that where a the university wants [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Those IPR Act Regulations &#8211; are they unconstitional? &#8211;</title>
		<link>http://aliquidnovi.org/privatising-public-knowledge-draft-regulations-confusing-the-public-domain-and-the-commons/comment-page-1/#comment-62705</link>
		<dc:creator>Those IPR Act Regulations &#8211; are they unconstitional? &#8211;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aliquidnovi.org/?p=293#comment-62705</guid>
		<description>[...] Legal Brief has posted a brief referring to Andrew Rens&#8217;s blogpost arguing that the Draft Regulations for the implementation of the IPR Act of 2008 are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Legal Brief has posted a brief referring to Andrew Rens&#8217;s blogpost arguing that the Draft Regulations for the implementation of the IPR Act of 2008 are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

