<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: strange device: a certification mark for open educational resources</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aliquidnovi.org/strange-device-a-certification-mark-for-open-educational-resources/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aliquidnovi.org/strange-device-a-certification-mark-for-open-educational-resources/</link>
	<description>Africa creativity innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 17:01:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=986</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Surman</title>
		<link>http://aliquidnovi.org/strange-device-a-certification-mark-for-open-educational-resources/comment-page-1/#comment-11724</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Surman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aliquidnovi.org/?p=95#comment-11724</guid>
		<description>I like the idea of a certification mark ... something similar to the CC logo. However, I think it&#039;s only got value if it stays simple and works on the self certification principle. It&#039;s this combo of simple + opt in that has made open source so virally successful (ie. I can just pick up the GPL, use it and say my software is open source). Of course, there could be a middle ground where there is a certifying body for the marks themselves, similar to what FSF and OSI do for licenses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea of a certification mark &#8230; something similar to the CC logo. However, I think it&#8217;s only got value if it stays simple and works on the self certification principle. It&#8217;s this combo of simple + opt in that has made open source so virally successful (ie. I can just pick up the GPL, use it and say my software is open source). Of course, there could be a middle ground where there is a certifying body for the marks themselves, similar to what FSF and OSI do for licenses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

