Pretoria High Court refuses to delay network licences

Written by Andrew Rens on October 31st, 2008

After two days of hearings the Pretoria High Court has rejected the application by the Minister of Communications to delay the effect of its previous ruling; that holders of VANS licences are entitled to network licences. The news has been greated with great excitement at MyBroadband.

This means that all VANS licencees are entitled to a network licences on application. The court previously ruled that ICASA has to convert the licences of a class of licensees referred to as VANS (Value Added Network Services) in the Telecommunications Act. The Telecommunications Act was replaced by the Electronic Communications Act, which requires ICASA to convert existing licences. That judgement was hailed as the start of a new era of telecommunications competition.

The Minister of Communications appealed the ruling, and announced that she was planning to change the legislation to effectively retrospectively override the ruling. The Minister also applied to court to delay the effect of the ruling until after the appeal. In other words ICASA would not have to comply with the ruling while the appeal was being heard, a process which usually takes years. In the meantime only a few VANS licensees would have been permitted network licences, and the Minister would have had an opportunity to change the law to deny other VANS licensees network licences. The court rejected the Minister’s application.That means that ICASA must issues network licences to VANS providers, at least to those who ask for them.

Its still possible that the Minister may try to amend the law to retrospectively deny VANS licencees. That attempt to use legislation to over-rule a court could itself be challenged.But time is running out for ICASA which must convert the licencees under legislation which came into force in mid 2006, more than two years ago.

*I’ve used the term “network licences” to refer to the rather long Electronic Network Communication Service Licences.

 

Does Opt out from Direct Marketing Work?

Written by Andrew Rens on October 17th, 2008

Edited to add: I originally posted this titled as ‘Ban Telemarketing: Opt Out Doesn’t Work’ on 17 October. On the 22nd October I did receive a reply, as a comment on this blog, from the Direct Marketing Association of South Africa. I have set out the sequence of events so that you can decide for yourself, as the new title suggests.

How should telemarketing be regulated? Should telemarketing be banned?
Should telemarketers be allowed to cold call strangers or should people have had to opt in to receive calls.

During the public consultation preceding the passing of the Electronic Communications Act direct marketers argued that industry self regulation would work. They said that they would establish an opt out system, that is a system in which consumers could self register. Members of the self regulating industry would not make unsolicited communication to those consumers. At the time scepticism was expressed, because it would always be possible for some in the industry to refuse abide by the industry association’s rules.

Conducting research on direct marketing in South Africa is relatively easy, I simply had to wait, and not long. In common with many South Africans, I have been receiving many calls which I neither requested nor want. I made use of the the opt out register of the Direct Marketing Association in South Africa. The DMA has an online form which a consumer must fill in. On completion the consumer is sent an email, which contains a confirmation link, the consumer connects the link to confirm the email address, and the transaction.

The disclosure of private information demanded by the form is rather daunting; full name, identity number, physical and postal addresses, work, home, cell and fax phone numbers, multiple email addresses. What will be done with this private data? What safeguards are in place to protect this data?

On the other hand one might want the end result, freedom from constant disruptive calls from people who have been trained to override one’s objections that one does not need a particular product. If one decides to disclose this information then one does one get in exchange?

I filled in the online firm, received the confirmation link, selected it, and assumed that from then on I would not get calls from members of the DMASA. I even shared my knowledge by posting a link the Opt Out Register on my Facebook status.

At about 12h16 on Thursday 16 October 2008 I received a call from one ‘Ramona’ who identified herself as acting on behalf of SOS Assist and the Unlimited Group. When it became apparent that this was an unsolicited sales call I enquired from Ramona whether SOS Assist/Unlimited are members of the Direct Marketing Association of South Africa. She claimed that SOS Assist/Unlimited Group are indeed members. I then advised her that I have subscribed to the Opt Out Register of the Association and requested that I speak to her supervisor. I wanted to enquire why the Opt Out Register is ineffective. Ramona promptly cut me off.

I wandered why SOS Assist would bother to be members of DMASA and then not comply with their rules, so I ran a little search on the World Wide Web for SOS Access, and came across http://www.theunlimitedworld.co.za.

I noticed that there is no Promotion of Access to Information Manual on the site, well at least not that I could find….which amounts to not having one, the point of the Promotion of Access to Information Act is after all that people can access information. I decided to give them a call, and phoned the telephone number on the website. When I spoke to the receptionist I asked to be put through to the legal advisor, since I thought that I should mention the lack of a PAIA manual to him or her. However the receptionist demanded to know what I wanted to speak to the legal advisor about, and when I tried to explain did not put me through.

Back on the website I did eventually find out that Z Buchan is the CEO of the Unlimited Group, and the fax number, and so I addressed a fax to Mr or Ms Buchan. I also sent a telefax to the complaints department of the Direct Marketing Association of South Africa asking for an investigation of why their members insist on phoning people who have opted out. A few hours later I received a very prompt, polite and efficient call from Jacky at the DMASA, who enquired what my identity number was so that she could check whether I appeared on the Opt Out Register. Shortly thereafter I received an email from Jacky claiming that I do not appear on the register. I sent back just as prompt an email to her explaining the circumstances of my filling in the form etc, and for good measure I also sent a copy of the email from their system with the link which I had to select to confirm. I didn receive a reply.

One of the arguments used to defend opt out from direct marketing is that telecommunication can the effort to opt out from direct marketing trivial for a consumer.
Consider my experience, I am one of the tiny minority of South Africans who have Internet access. I found out about the Opt Out Register, I took the time to go through the tedious flash page of the Direct Marketing Association’s first webpage (an experience I spared readers of this blog by deep linking) then through the home page, then on to the page discussing the opt out register, and finally on to the register itself. I then disclosed private information on the understanding that this would stop the flood of calls.

Despite this I continued to receive calls I neither want nor need. Two faxes, two phone calls, and three emails later I was told that I wasn’t on the register.

Edited to add:

After I had posted the post above I sent a telefax alerting the Direct Marketing Association that I had done so on 17th October 2008.

On the 22nd of October I received a response from the Direct Marketing Association, as a comment on this blog, which I immediately permitted. I also changed the blog title to an open question.

The response did not address the issue which I had raised in my emails to Jacky and on this blog; that although I had filled in the on-line form the system apparently didn’t register my details. I have subsequently been advised that “ The members only view the register once per month on the first working day of the month.”

Thus although I had apparently registered members of the DMASA would continue to call me until the first of the next month.

I’ll let the readers of this blog decide for yourselves whether you think its worth while registering with the Direct Market Association of South Africa.

It seems that they should provide people who register with some kind of proof of effective registration and advise them that registration will not be immediately effective.

Lets see what happens.