Book Review: Coercion, why we listen to what “they” say, by Douglas Rushkoff

Written by Andrew Rens on June 12th, 2008

Anyone living in a consumer society is likely to benefit from reading this book, finding it an insightful if disturbing expose of manipulation techniques employed by marketers, media and politicians. You will never trust a salesman again.

The author’s message is simple, salesmen and marketers do not intend their targets to behave rationally, they design their communications to influence their targets; consumers and citizens to behave irrationally. The books exploration of this is easy to follow, if somewhat limited. Rushkoff draws attention to his own use of the techniques, which he explains is a further technique to disarm the reader, by treating the readers as one of those in the know. This undercutting is intended to serve a further message, the conclusion at the end of the book, which is that there is no ‘they’, instead that ‘we’ are all somehow implicated in the coercion through manipulative techniques. The conclusion is positioned as empowering, by suggesting that we are all part of the problem, we are intended to conclude

To reach that conclusion the book fudges the difference between persuasion and coercion, fails to analyse the role of market structures, media culture and the history of diminution of moral capital. As a result the book fails to attain the status of critical cultural commentary.

It is however a useful primer on the range of manipulative marketing techniques employed in contemporary consumer societies. Read (or reread) the second chapter before setting out to buy a car.

This book was reviewed for the Shuttleworth Foundation bookclub.

 

ISO suspends OOXML while considering Appeals

Written by Andrew Rens on June 11th, 2008

According to a press release the International Standards Organisation has suspended publication of OOXML as an ISO standard during the appeal process.

According to the press release four countries appealed the ballot resolution process which resulted in a change to the 2007 ballot which decided against OOXML. The four countries; South Africa, Brazil, Venezuela and India include three emerging economies with strong local IT sectors.

The Secretary-General’s of ISO and the IEC are to submit the appeal to their management boards within 30 days. The management boards will decide how the appeals will be dealt with. One option is to establish a conciliation panel which would try to resolve the appeals, a process which could take several months. The rules give the boards an option to refuse to process the appeals. This seems unlikely since the appeals are based on no mere technicality but grave concerns about the integrity of JTC1 processes. These concerns are not only those raised by the four appealing members of ISO but also in the aftermath of a highly contested and politicised process. The appeals represent an opportunity for ISO to restore public confidence in the impartiality and independence of its processes.